|
|
|
|
Process studies & independent
design
reviews
Adequate separation of oil, gas, water and solids is one of the key
elements in the successful operation of a production or processing
facility. This makes the design and selection of separation equipment,
such as separators and scrubbers together with their internals, a
critical step in the execution of a project.
Commonly, Oil & Gas companies and EPC
contractors obtain proposals for the design and supply of
separation equipment from
internals vendors or vessel manufacturers.

The challenge then faced by the Oil & Gas company and EPC
contractor is how to assess the true technical suitability of
the design proposed by the sub-supplier for its
intended service. The question is: Will the performance guarantee
provided with the proposed design actually be met in practice?
This essential question can be a difficult question to answer by the
project team since
their expertise understandably does not
include in-depth knowledge of the intricacies and details of separation
internals design, such as flow distribution, performance and hydraulics
considerations, as well as potential pit-falls associated with
separation internals designs.
To assist Oil & Gas companies, EPC contractors and vessel
manufacturers in their
selection of separation equipment and to assist
with debottlenecking of existing separation equipment, Kranji
Solutions
provides the following process studies and review services:
- Independent design reviews
- Conceptual studies
- Separator design for FEED or detailed design phase
- Debottlenecking studies
When preparing these studies, special attention is given to the
intricacies
and details of separation internals design, such as flow distribution,
performance, hydraulics considerations, interactions with the upstream
and downstream equipment, etc.
Benefits:
- The review is
independent; Kranji Solutions does not supply hardware.
- Be able to make a well founded equipment selection
based on an in-depth assessment by experts.
- Save time (manhours) during the project phase.
- Reduce the risk of operating issues upon start-up.
- Reduce the risk of costly retrofits and downtime due
to equipment malperformance.
- Save time during project execution.
|
|
|